414 EB vs 414 B ULS

Let's talk about kits and mics, new and old. What are you using? What do you want? What's the difference?

Moderators: ChrisW, rick, Mark Bassett

414 EB vs 414 B ULS

Postby SamJ » Tue Oct 28, 2014 5:23 pm

Im on the fence - whether to get a pair of EB's with CK12, or the B ULS which seem to do 90 per cent of the work the EB's do (mainly referring to drum overheads here)….

Used both these versions a few times over the years, but never regularly enough to make a call on whether the EB's are worth the extra 3 - 4k.

I feel like just going for the old monsters, but as Im setting up a new studio, Im feeling that 3k could be another 1176, another mic, go towards extra construction or aesthetics/ furniture etc….

Opinions?

P.s - not interested in the newer XL ii's. Just to brittle in bright rooms.
Sam Johnson
User avatar
SamJ
Registered User
Registered User
 
Posts: 28
Joined: Mon May 05, 2014 4:58 am

Re: 414 EB vs 414 B ULS

Postby Senad » Thu Oct 30, 2014 9:57 pm

So, the pair will be mainly for OH or you're just saying BULS do 90% as well as Ebs on OHs?
Senad Mu ja gic
User avatar
Senad
Frequent Contributor
Frequent Contributor
 
Posts: 564
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 10:07 pm
Location: Melbourne

Re: 414 EB vs 414 B ULS

Postby SamJ » Sun Nov 02, 2014 1:58 am

They would mainly be for overheads, yes.

In my experience using both (EB/ BULS) as overheads, the EB's felt much smoother in the high end, but I have never had the opportunity to compare directly.
I was hoping to discuss from someone who has…..

Apologies for the poorly written first message.
Sam Johnson
User avatar
SamJ
Registered User
Registered User
 
Posts: 28
Joined: Mon May 05, 2014 4:58 am

Re: 414 EB vs 414 B ULS

Postby Senad » Sun Nov 02, 2014 9:45 am

No, not poorly written Sam, just wasn't 100% clear... And reason I asked is that I was just wondering if you considered anything else as the main OH pair... like a pair of Coles for example.
...and sorry, I can't be of much help comparing the two versions of the 414s.
I'm sure someone will chime in with their experiences :-bd
Senad Mu ja gic
User avatar
Senad
Frequent Contributor
Frequent Contributor
 
Posts: 564
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 10:07 pm
Location: Melbourne

Re: 414 EB vs 414 B ULS

Postby SamJ » Mon Nov 03, 2014 10:36 pm

Cheers Senad.

Already have a pair of Coles 4038 on the list, maybe already sorted.
I have plenty of Octava's and a few old km's for SDC's, but wanted to add some LDC's (aside from Neumanns)….
Sam Johnson
User avatar
SamJ
Registered User
Registered User
 
Posts: 28
Joined: Mon May 05, 2014 4:58 am

Re: 414 EB vs 414 B ULS

Postby Senad » Wed Nov 05, 2014 9:20 am

Ahaa..cool Sam.. I see your list in the classifieds now ;)
Senad Mu ja gic
User avatar
Senad
Frequent Contributor
Frequent Contributor
 
Posts: 564
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 10:07 pm
Location: Melbourne

Re: 414 EB vs 414 B ULS

Postby Mal » Sat Nov 08, 2014 6:39 pm

The older 414 EBs will most likely give you a little more 'character'..brighter in a good way...
the ULBs have the teflon capsule and are very 'flat' mic in terms of freq response..very useful for using on brighter instruments when you don't want to bring that out...If you also wanted to record vocals then the 414 EB could come into service also there..
Mal Stanley
Presenter/Producer 'Jazztrack'
Recording Engineer/Producer
ABC Jazz/ABC RN
Southbank Melbourne
Mal
Registered User
Registered User
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2014 5:52 pm

Re: 414 EB vs 414 B ULS

Postby SamJ » Tue Nov 11, 2014 11:34 pm

Thanks Mal.
That's very similar to how I recall it.
Appreciate it mate.
Sam Johnson
User avatar
SamJ
Registered User
Registered User
 
Posts: 28
Joined: Mon May 05, 2014 4:58 am


Return to Recording Drums?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest