- It is currently Sat Apr 20, 2024 6:54 am • All times are UTC + 10 hours [ DST ]
mid side compression question
Moderators: rick, Mark Bassett
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
mid side compression question
I read a mention about mid side compression, I believe it is being able to compress the middle of the song leaving the stereo image alone? Can anyone explain what the technique is and how this can be done digitally, ie. in the box? Thanks.
- Henry
- Registered User
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 11:52 pm
- Location: Sydney
Decoding MS and LR is just sum and difference, both ways, and can be done in analog or digital.
To decode MS into LR, it's simply L = M + S and R = M - S
To encode MS from LR (like the MS compressors do), M = L/2 + R/2 while S = L/2 - R/2. You can then compress the mid bit separately as you wish, and then decode the compressed signal back to LR.
The point of it all for compression, as far as I understand, is to avoid some of the compression stereo phase problems becuase you are only in effect compressing a mono signal.
An analog MS to LR schematic can be found here.
I've just bought the Paia MS microphone kit which adopts the usual MS recording technique - rather than a cariod and an omni, it used 3 cardiods but sums them all into a balanced LR signal within the box. I suspect at some point I'll upgrade the supplied electret mics with better capsules, but the principle of the thing looks sound.[/url]
To decode MS into LR, it's simply L = M + S and R = M - S
To encode MS from LR (like the MS compressors do), M = L/2 + R/2 while S = L/2 - R/2. You can then compress the mid bit separately as you wish, and then decode the compressed signal back to LR.
The point of it all for compression, as far as I understand, is to avoid some of the compression stereo phase problems becuase you are only in effect compressing a mono signal.
An analog MS to LR schematic can be found here.
I've just bought the Paia MS microphone kit which adopts the usual MS recording technique - rather than a cariod and an omni, it used 3 cardiods but sums them all into a balanced LR signal within the box. I suspect at some point I'll upgrade the supplied electret mics with better capsules, but the principle of the thing looks sound.[/url]
-
chris p - Frequent Contributor
- Posts: 882
- Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 6:15 pm
- Location: Sydney, NSW
I just bought 10 transound 165a capsules with the specific intention of making a MS capable set of mics (3 side address cards for easy placement - making a mount for them, but can use them seperately if I like - decode using fancy bussing in PC).
These might be good upgrade for your Paia Chris? They arrived a few days ago. All up it cost about $80Aus to get 10 of them here.
the good thing about these electrets is there is no crappy FET built in.
These might be good upgrade for your Paia Chris? They arrived a few days ago. All up it cost about $80Aus to get 10 of them here.
the good thing about these electrets is there is no crappy FET built in.
- PeterR
There are a few MS encoders around (that convert Left+Right to Mid+Side) in software, there's a "suite" including MS Compressor here: http://mdsp.smartelectronix.com/mstools/
Worth a poke arounfd the rest of the site too, there's alot of cool, free, stuff.
Worth a poke arounfd the rest of the site too, there's alot of cool, free, stuff.
-
Kurt - Valued Contributor
- Posts: 1235
- Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 1:02 am
- Location: Canberra
Traditionally used more to tame or eliminate out of phase low frequencies, stemming from requirements in the vinyl cutting process. Used it this morning on an electronic track (backing track made on a Sony PS1!)
Also great for pushing vocals 'forward' with gentle mid EQ without affecting what's panned in the mix.
As an engineer friend often says: "The possibilities are mindless".
Also great for pushing vocals 'forward' with gentle mid EQ without affecting what's panned in the mix.
As an engineer friend often says: "The possibilities are mindless".
-
Adam Dempsey - Registered User
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 5:39 pm
- Location: Melbourne
Mindless indeed, especially the ability to adjust image width as a function of frequency, panning the center image and even rotating the entire sound stage.
MS can also be used to 'correct' the lack of bass width that often accompanies single point stereo microphone techniques. i.e boosting the bottom end of the S component (known as Shuffling) can give the stereo image more spaciousness - basically introducing out of phase low frequencies which can cause issues (see above).
This is more mixing related but I did a MS recording of the Devonshire St tunnel at Central Station in Syd a few months back using a Schoeps MS rig (see below) and a Nagra V 24/96. When i walked out of the tunnel I was lucky enough to capture two buskers (double bass and sax) jammin on the side of the street. In the studio i was able to vary the 'street noise to busker ratio' using an MS processor. I could eliminate busses driving past almost completely while leaving the buskers in tact. I ended up automating the S channel to get the perfect mix of surry hills street sounds and sidewalk jazz. I shuffled the bass which definately gave the whole recording more 'believeability' (however subtle) while pushing up the S in the tunnel for obvious reasons.
Schoeps MS Setup
MS can also be used to 'correct' the lack of bass width that often accompanies single point stereo microphone techniques. i.e boosting the bottom end of the S component (known as Shuffling) can give the stereo image more spaciousness - basically introducing out of phase low frequencies which can cause issues (see above).
This is more mixing related but I did a MS recording of the Devonshire St tunnel at Central Station in Syd a few months back using a Schoeps MS rig (see below) and a Nagra V 24/96. When i walked out of the tunnel I was lucky enough to capture two buskers (double bass and sax) jammin on the side of the street. In the studio i was able to vary the 'street noise to busker ratio' using an MS processor. I could eliminate busses driving past almost completely while leaving the buskers in tact. I ended up automating the S channel to get the perfect mix of surry hills street sounds and sidewalk jazz. I shuffled the bass which definately gave the whole recording more 'believeability' (however subtle) while pushing up the S in the tunnel for obvious reasons.
Schoeps MS Setup
-
Mark Bassett - Forum Admin
- Posts: 539
- Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 6:15 pm
To break it down MS is simply a different way to think about sound. Blumlein proposed that music isn
Last edited by Mark Bassett on Mon Sep 12, 2005 10:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Mark Bassett - Forum Admin
- Posts: 539
- Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 6:15 pm
Thanks Mark
That was a great post, and certainly gave me a few new ideas, mainly the concept of doing processing to the ms signal other then stereo width. I always knew you could do it, but it never actually struck me in that way. I suppose that it would be very useful with live recordings where you have a limited number of input channels.
- JulienG
- Regular Contributor
- Posts: 263
- Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 3:02 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia
Hey has anyone tried compressing the M and S signal with different compressors, eg a Distressor on the Mid and an LA2 on the Side? To the mastering guys, would this seriously compromise your options in mastering?
- Peter Knight
- Registered User
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 1:02 pm
- Location: Perth
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Return to The Turtlerock Forum
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests