Help! anyone know how to deal with this?

An audio community like no other.

Moderators: rick, Mark Bassett

Help! anyone know how to deal with this?

Postby The Tasmanian » Sun Jan 31, 2010 3:54 pm

Hi Turtlerockers - I have a problem.........
Recently I recorded an album at 96khz -BUT - the external clock (Mytek) was set at 88.1khz.
So protools has written the audio tracks stamping them as 96khz files - yet they are really 88.1khz.
So the files play faster - its a common problem with protools and having an external clock set incorrectly.
I know of a tech that can change the "stamped" 96khz files and restamp them as 88khz files by rewriting them
Does anyone know how to do this?
Has anyone done this ?
C h r i z t o w n o
The Tasmanian
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
 
Posts: 1901
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 8:04 am
Location: Deep in the woods....

Postby heathen » Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:16 pm

Bummer, I hate it when that happens. Copy the files before you do anything. Can't you just play them back with the system set to 88.2? You could do a SRC but that could bugger the sound, though there are some good SRC's these days.
Heath Smith
User avatar
heathen
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
 
Posts: 1745
Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 11:15 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby Ben M » Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:30 pm

Chris you could try consolidating the files, then export them as 88's (to a desktop folder) and re-import into a separate new 88 session. I'm sure you've been down this road.

:)
User avatar
Ben M
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
 
Posts: 1920
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 11:54 am
Location: Sydney and Kangaroo Valley, NSW

Postby jkhuri44 » Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:45 pm

import at 88.1 and tell PT not to do a SRC conversion into the new session.

i think thats right? the figure might have to change, but re-importing without SRC would be the easiest and most non damaging way me thinks.

Otherwise, a batch SRC in something like soundforge could be the go.
Jamil Khuri
Amusement & Audio Engineer
"it's not awesome unless its 240bpm with distorted 909 kicks!"
jkhuri44
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 2537
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 10:53 pm
Location: Dundas

Postby geofflee » Sun Jan 31, 2010 5:41 pm

This seems to be a common problem on the DUC forum. The solution is to create a session at 88.2 and and use Import Session Data to import the tracks from the 96 session, choosing not to SRC the audio.
Last edited by geofflee on Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Geoff Lee
geofflee
Registered User
Registered User
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 11:47 pm
Location: sydney nsw

Postby Ben M » Sun Jan 31, 2010 7:47 pm

Thanks J and G, that's the best way to explain what I was getting at. :)
User avatar
Ben M
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
 
Posts: 1920
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 11:54 am
Location: Sydney and Kangaroo Valley, NSW

Postby jkhuri44 » Sun Jan 31, 2010 9:00 pm

i made a mistake,

the first part of my post was right, under no circumstance do u wanna be doing an SRC on the recorded files, as that will keep them at the old pitch....u want to import them with the wrong sample rate so that their pitch adjusts.

this will preserve the audio quality too.
Jamil Khuri
Amusement & Audio Engineer
"it's not awesome unless its 240bpm with distorted 909 kicks!"
jkhuri44
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 2537
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 10:53 pm
Location: Dundas

Postby Ben M » Sun Jan 31, 2010 9:16 pm

Look we were meant to have jet packs by now. Don't start me. The least we could have done is perfect proper DAW vari-speed controls.
User avatar
Ben M
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
 
Posts: 1920
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 11:54 am
Location: Sydney and Kangaroo Valley, NSW

Postby geofflee » Sun Jan 31, 2010 9:22 pm

Importing session data (without SRC into a new session created at the original external clock rate) keeps all editing/dropins/playlists/mixing info in place. Use Copy Audio rather than Link Audio so that the new session has self-contained audio files.

It is common knowledge that jet packs usually operate at 256 ktpg, but there's been many a mishap from accidently setting at 192 ktpg.
Geoff Lee
geofflee
Registered User
Registered User
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 11:47 pm
Location: sydney nsw

Postby Ben M » Sun Jan 31, 2010 9:32 pm

geofflee wrote:It is common knowledge that jet packs usually operate at 256 ktpg, but there's been many a mishap from accidently setting at 192 ktpg.


Ditto.

Where's my jet pack!?

:)
User avatar
Ben M
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
 
Posts: 1920
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 11:54 am
Location: Sydney and Kangaroo Valley, NSW

Postby The Tasmanian » Sun Jan 31, 2010 10:09 pm

Thanks guys - I will give it a go and let you know
C h r i z t o w n o
The Tasmanian
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
 
Posts: 1901
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 8:04 am
Location: Deep in the woods....

Postby jkhuri44 » Mon Feb 01, 2010 1:12 pm

Ben Moore wrote:Look we were meant to have jet packs by now. Don't start me. The least we could have done is perfect proper DAW vari-speed controls.


and hoverboards.
Jamil Khuri
Amusement & Audio Engineer
"it's not awesome unless its 240bpm with distorted 909 kicks!"
jkhuri44
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 2537
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 10:53 pm
Location: Dundas

Postby Ben M » Mon Feb 01, 2010 1:29 pm

jkhuri44 wrote:
Ben Moore wrote:Look we were meant to have jet packs by now. Don't start me. The least we could have done is perfect proper DAW vari-speed controls.


and hoverboards.


and teleporters..........
User avatar
Ben M
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
 
Posts: 1920
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 11:54 am
Location: Sydney and Kangaroo Valley, NSW

Postby rick » Mon Feb 01, 2010 1:46 pm

i have a wayback machine , but as i keep saying its a bit dodgy , needs some new tubes and they are really hard to find

john howard repealled the "jetpack for every australian" law in 2000

dont hold your breath on krudd bring it back either
Rick O'Neil
I think we went to different schools together
turtlerockmastering.com
we listen
User avatar
rick
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 3486
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 8:02 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby Ben M » Mon Feb 01, 2010 1:52 pm

rick wrote:i have a wayback machine , but as i keep saying its a bit dodgy , needs some new tubes and they are really hard to find

john howard repealled the "jetpack for every australian" law in 2000

dont hold your breath on krudd bring it back either


I have a feeling John Howard has his own wayback machine, and it got stuck in the 50's. :)
Probably needs a new flux capacitor. Have you got a spare one in the shed Rick?
User avatar
Ben M
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
 
Posts: 1920
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 11:54 am
Location: Sydney and Kangaroo Valley, NSW

Postby rick » Mon Feb 01, 2010 2:23 pm

nah the flux cap is fine... its a rare little telefunken metal tube i am looking for
only made during world war 2 for the third reich
Rick O'Neil
I think we went to different schools together
turtlerockmastering.com
we listen
User avatar
rick
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 3486
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 8:02 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby The Tasmanian » Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:20 pm

Thank you guys - problem solved
C h r i z t o w n o
The Tasmanian
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
 
Posts: 1901
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 8:04 am
Location: Deep in the woods....

Postby rick » Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:38 pm

hey chris
might be nice if you tell us which one of the many methods brought up actually did the job for you :)
Rick O'Neil
I think we went to different schools together
turtlerockmastering.com
we listen
User avatar
rick
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 3486
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 8:02 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby The Tasmanian » Thu Feb 04, 2010 8:38 am

Create a 88.2k session
Import session data - and deselect sample rate conversion.
So simple!
C h r i z t o w n o
The Tasmanian
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
 
Posts: 1901
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 8:04 am
Location: Deep in the woods....


Return to The Turtlerock Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests