- It is currently Tue Jul 28, 2026 9:25 am • All times are UTC + 10 hours [ DST ]
Pop Filters
Moderators: rick, Mark Bassett
27 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Pop Filters
Hi Guys,
Just a random thought - do you think that a pop filter's design could completely handle the 'de essing' of a vocal recording?
As in, a Pop Filter works by lowering the annoying 'ess' sounds in the vocals, without affecting the remaining sounds.
So, if you used 3 pop filters instead of one, would that completely solve the 'de essing' issue?
I only ask because I encounter issues with my particular electronic de essing tool and, if I could solve de essing naturally/acoustically (without having to use an electronic tool) that would be good.
Has anyone ever played around with multiple (or extra thick) pop filters and their placement?
Or does the overall vocal track sound quality start to seriously degrade at a much faster rate than the de essing ability when using multiple/thicker pop filters?
Just wanted your opinion before I invested time/money into that train of thought...
Thanks!!
D.
Just a random thought - do you think that a pop filter's design could completely handle the 'de essing' of a vocal recording?
As in, a Pop Filter works by lowering the annoying 'ess' sounds in the vocals, without affecting the remaining sounds.
So, if you used 3 pop filters instead of one, would that completely solve the 'de essing' issue?
I only ask because I encounter issues with my particular electronic de essing tool and, if I could solve de essing naturally/acoustically (without having to use an electronic tool) that would be good.
Has anyone ever played around with multiple (or extra thick) pop filters and their placement?
Or does the overall vocal track sound quality start to seriously degrade at a much faster rate than the de essing ability when using multiple/thicker pop filters?
Just wanted your opinion before I invested time/money into that train of thought...
Thanks!!
D.
Name: David Shore
- Amateur / VERY Novice Recording Engineer. I do it as a hobby only, but for many hours every day
- Amateur / VERY Novice Recording Engineer. I do it as a hobby only, but for many hours every day
- Dave Shore
- Registered User

- Posts: 22
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 1:50 pm
interesting question as the diaghargm (however you spell it), moves by air pressure on a mic. So if you limit the amount of air pressure I guess it will start to serious impact the sound. I guess just do the experiment yourself.
Dale Smith
-

HA_DA_JA - Valued Contributor

- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:47 pm
- Location: Brisbane
good mic + Royer metal grill pop filter = no probs (most of the time)
usually poly stocking style filters muckaround with the hi end...so, 3 of em, will muckaround 3 times as much! :(
usually poly stocking style filters muckaround with the hi end...so, 3 of em, will muckaround 3 times as much! :(
Jamil Khuri
Amusement & Audio Engineer
"it's not awesome unless its 240bpm with distorted 909 kicks!"
Amusement & Audio Engineer
"it's not awesome unless its 240bpm with distorted 909 kicks!"
- jkhuri44
- Forum Veteran

- Posts: 2537
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 10:53 pm
- Location: Dundas
I tend to move the vocalist around on the mic, like going more across the mic instead of singing straight into it etc can help. Changing mics helps too, but obviously this isn't an option for everyone.
In mixing I often have the top end or 'air' part of a lead vocal on a seperate track as in I don't eq the original vocal very bright, but I have a copy of that that is very bright mixed in under the original track. I use a passive eq for this as you are cranking the top a lot and it sounds smoother to me. You can de-ess the crap out of this 'topend track' and it's not as noticeable because it is sitting under the main vocal track and pretty much dissapears when the de-esser kicks in, leaving only the original 'not so bright' track to do the s's. Does that make sense?
In mixing I often have the top end or 'air' part of a lead vocal on a seperate track as in I don't eq the original vocal very bright, but I have a copy of that that is very bright mixed in under the original track. I use a passive eq for this as you are cranking the top a lot and it sounds smoother to me. You can de-ess the crap out of this 'topend track' and it's not as noticeable because it is sitting under the main vocal track and pretty much dissapears when the de-esser kicks in, leaving only the original 'not so bright' track to do the s's. Does that make sense?
Andy Evans
http://www.mud.net.au
http://www.mud.net.au
-

Chinagraf - Valued Contributor

- Posts: 1608
- Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 1:09 am
- Location: Melbourne
Yes(ssssssss) that makes sense :)
I'll buy one of them Royer Metal filters as well then.
Thanks,
D.
I'll buy one of them Royer Metal filters as well then.
Thanks,
D.
Name: David Shore
- Amateur / VERY Novice Recording Engineer. I do it as a hobby only, but for many hours every day
- Amateur / VERY Novice Recording Engineer. I do it as a hobby only, but for many hours every day
- Dave Shore
- Registered User

- Posts: 22
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 1:50 pm
Hi Dave
Here's a trick for recording a vocal with too much sibilance (assuming your using a large diaphragm microphone).
Place a pencil vertically on the front of the mic directly in the middle of the diaphragm and then stick it to the mic using tape. No need for de-essers using this technique. Let me know what you think.
cheers Ben
Here's a trick for recording a vocal with too much sibilance (assuming your using a large diaphragm microphone).
Place a pencil vertically on the front of the mic directly in the middle of the diaphragm and then stick it to the mic using tape. No need for de-essers using this technique. Let me know what you think.
cheers Ben
Ben Moore
Harvest Recordings
Website: http://www.harvestrecordings.com.au
Facebook: http://www.faceback.com/harvestrecordings
Harvest Recordings
Website: http://www.harvestrecordings.com.au
Facebook: http://www.faceback.com/harvestrecordings
-

Ben M - Valued Contributor

- Posts: 1920
- Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 11:54 am
- Location: Sydney and Kangaroo Valley, NSW
Pop filters are designed to reduce plosives. A few respected engineers argue that the stocking style pop filter commercial or home made, actually makes the sibilance worse, and that the foam type that comes supplied with some neumann mics is a better option than the stocking over a frame.
Having one designed specifically for de essing......the problem i see here is that the frequencies such a filter would attenuate need to be in the vocal signal when not sssinging an ssss-word.
Having one designed specifically for de essing......the problem i see here is that the frequencies such a filter would attenuate need to be in the vocal signal when not sssinging an ssss-word.
Chris Hallam.
https://soundcloud.com/hallamsound
Whatever floats your boat.
https://soundcloud.com/hallamsound
Whatever floats your boat.
-

Chris H - Forum Veteran

- Posts: 2321
- Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 11:20 am
- Location: Off The Planet
I've tried the pencil technique a few times, I've found it does help a little but as with most techniques if the mic is bright and/or the singer is 'essy', there's always going to be a problem.
Al Smith
Perth, WA
http://www.bergerkstudios.com
http://draliensmith.bandcamp.com
Perth, WA
http://www.bergerkstudios.com
http://draliensmith.bandcamp.com
- DrAlienSmith
- Registered User

- Posts: 149
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2005 10:39 am
I would rather record a slightly 'essy' singer in all it's 'essy' glory than risk losing something forever because I blocked it on the way in.
You can always manipulate and treat it after it's recorded but if some of the magic gets filtered out before it even makes it into the converters, well....
You can always manipulate and treat it after it's recorded but if some of the magic gets filtered out before it even makes it into the converters, well....
Kristian Anderson
- musikwerks
- Frequent Contributor

- Posts: 713
- Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 9:58 am
Dave
What you want is an outboard de-esser from Orban - they come up quite often on the 'net. They use a pass-band filter in the "sss" frequency to trigger a fast compressor, so you still get the "sss" sound but at a lower volume (ie a volume that matches the rest of the program material). I have a two channel balanced in/out one that I love, for two reasons - the first is that it keeps the sound as "s" not "th", and the second is that its quite subtle - I tend to overdo my de-essing 'cause my ears get so attuned to the sound I'm trying to avoid. My Orban simply has a bypass switch and a volume reduction knob, so its as easy as pie to use and keeps it all real.
For magic de-essing, run the recording backwards through the Orban. The tail of the sibilance then becomes a slowly increasing trigger for the compression, so that its fully working by the time you hit the initial transient.
Anecdote time - I wish I knew the above when I recording a Christian songwriter a few years back - one line sounded like "JeSSSuSSS you SSSSeek and SSSave the LoSSSt", and I the best I could make it was "Jethuth you theek and thave the lotht". I ended up going with the original, with its sibilance, and if my memory serves I think Rick managed to tweak it when mastering.
What you want is an outboard de-esser from Orban - they come up quite often on the 'net. They use a pass-band filter in the "sss" frequency to trigger a fast compressor, so you still get the "sss" sound but at a lower volume (ie a volume that matches the rest of the program material). I have a two channel balanced in/out one that I love, for two reasons - the first is that it keeps the sound as "s" not "th", and the second is that its quite subtle - I tend to overdo my de-essing 'cause my ears get so attuned to the sound I'm trying to avoid. My Orban simply has a bypass switch and a volume reduction knob, so its as easy as pie to use and keeps it all real.
For magic de-essing, run the recording backwards through the Orban. The tail of the sibilance then becomes a slowly increasing trigger for the compression, so that its fully working by the time you hit the initial transient.
Anecdote time - I wish I knew the above when I recording a Christian songwriter a few years back - one line sounded like "JeSSSuSSS you SSSSeek and SSSave the LoSSSt", and I the best I could make it was "Jethuth you theek and thave the lotht". I ended up going with the original, with its sibilance, and if my memory serves I think Rick managed to tweak it when mastering.
Chris Preston
The man who gives meaning to the word "amateur"
The man who gives meaning to the word "amateur"
-

chris p - Frequent Contributor

- Posts: 882
- Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 6:15 pm
- Location: Sydney, NSW
When all else fails, .....actually, mostly well before i have given other options a go, i automate the volume of the problem bits of the vocal in Logic while watching the waveform.
One pass of the vocal using the fader to pull down the level during the sibilant bits. Then tidy up the automation in the draw feature in the arrange page. It's a no brainer and works better than any plug in or outboard de - esser i know of.
Another thing worth mentioning is how compression can exaggerate the problem of sibilance.
One pass of the vocal using the fader to pull down the level during the sibilant bits. Then tidy up the automation in the draw feature in the arrange page. It's a no brainer and works better than any plug in or outboard de - esser i know of.
Another thing worth mentioning is how compression can exaggerate the problem of sibilance.
Chris Hallam.
https://soundcloud.com/hallamsound
Whatever floats your boat.
https://soundcloud.com/hallamsound
Whatever floats your boat.
-

Chris H - Forum Veteran

- Posts: 2321
- Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 11:20 am
- Location: Off The Planet
chris p wrote:
Anecdote time - I wish I knew the above when I recording a Christian songwriter a few years back - one line sounded like "JeSSSuSSS you SSSSeek and SSSave the LoSSSt", and I the best I could make it was "Jethuth you theek and thave the lotht". I ended up going with the original, with its sibilance, and if my memory serves I think Rick managed to tweak it when mastering.
I bet there was a freaky message there if that was run backwards. :)
Heath Smith
-

heathen - Valued Contributor

- Posts: 1745
- Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 11:15 pm
- Location: Sydney
if i had of been around 2009 years ago i would have insisted they started the calender on its historical start date not some convenient near enough "wadda about here" date
and christmas would be spelled differently , my kids cannot say it yet without lisping on the ssses
by the time they figure it out i am sure christmas will have lost its appeal :)
and christmas would be spelled differently , my kids cannot say it yet without lisping on the ssses
by the time they figure it out i am sure christmas will have lost its appeal :)
Rick O'Neil
I think we went to different schools together
turtlerockmastering.com
we listen
I think we went to different schools together
turtlerockmastering.com
we listen
-

rick - Moderator

- Posts: 3486
- Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 8:02 pm
- Location: Sydney
rick wrote:if i had of been around 2009 years ago i would have insisted they started the calender on its historical start date not some convenient near enough "wadda about here" date
and christmas would be spelled differently , my kids cannot say it yet without lisping on the ssses
by the time they figure it out i am sure christmas will have lost its appeal :)
but isn't it cute to hear the kiddy chrissmass lisp?? ;-)
i know exactly what you're talking about Rick - I have the same at my place!
Tim Spencer
Pressurepoint Studios
Pressurepoint Studios
-

TimS - Valued Contributor

- Posts: 1734
- Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 3:11 pm
- Location: Sydney
[quote="rick"] my kids cannot say it yet without lisping on the ssses
[/quote]
Perhaps you are de-essing them a little too much?
[/quote]
Perhaps you are de-essing them a little too much?
Andy Evans
http://www.mud.net.au
http://www.mud.net.au
-

Chinagraf - Valued Contributor

- Posts: 1608
- Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 1:09 am
- Location: Melbourne
Hi Ben,
Just quickly - yep, I did the pencil on the mic and yes it helps a lot.
Now I might try it with a Nikko pen or something larger...
D.
Just quickly - yep, I did the pencil on the mic and yes it helps a lot.
Now I might try it with a Nikko pen or something larger...
D.
Name: David Shore
- Amateur / VERY Novice Recording Engineer. I do it as a hobby only, but for many hours every day
- Amateur / VERY Novice Recording Engineer. I do it as a hobby only, but for many hours every day
- Dave Shore
- Registered User

- Posts: 22
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 1:50 pm
fwiw, re plosives & dynamic mics: aim the mic at either corner of the vocalist's mouth.
Definitely.
Chris H wrote:Another thing worth mentioning is how compression can exaggerate the problem of sibilance.
Definitely.
-

Adam Dempsey - Registered User

- Posts: 139
- Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 5:39 pm
- Location: Melbourne
Chris H wrote:When all else fails, .....actually, mostly well before i have given other options a go, i automate the volume of the problem bits of the vocal in Logic while watching the waveform.
One pass of the vocal using the fader to pull down the level during the sibilant bits. Then tidy up the automation in the draw feature in the arrange page. It's a no brainer and works better than any plug in or outboard de - esser i know of.
Yesss..Same here..apart from the fact that I go straight into "pencil" work without the fader pass..a bit less messy for me that way..
Senad Mu ja gic
-

Senad - Frequent Contributor

- Posts: 581
- Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 10:07 pm
- Location: Melbourne
I also automate the 'sss' down within pro tools. I don't automate the volume on the vocal track itself though. I select and duplicate the 'sss' part of the region and copy it to a separate track, making sure the position the new 'sss' segments doesn't move (ie the copy is exactly above the original sss). The new track needs to be visually above the original track in the edit window. Assign them to the same voice. As they have the same voice, only the top track will play, which is the sss. Now you've got a dedicated ssss fader, just turn it down and you'll turn down the sss's. Automation is easier this way too.
-

Mark Bassett - Forum Admin

- Posts: 540
- Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 6:15 pm
27 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Return to The Turtlerock Forum
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests