Page 1 of 1
making male vocals BIG!

Posted:
Sat Jul 07, 2007 10:30 am
by jkhuri44
Gday dudez...
just wonderin if anyone can share any "secrets" in regards to making an actually "thin"...and semi high pitched male voice..sound "bigger"..and more..."manly"....
this is more of a mix question...as i know that part of engineering, you would select the right mic, that sounds "BIG".....
any ideas would be awesome... :)

Posted:
Sat Jul 07, 2007 10:39 am
by jkhuri44
sorry...to be more clear..
"semi high pitched" doesnt make alot of sense...i just got up...haha
i mean more....thin framed, not buff.....
etc...

Posted:
Sat Jul 07, 2007 12:18 pm
by davemc
What mics and pres do you have. Try a few combos and see which sounds better I have have used anything from kick mics to LDC and see which works. You can always try double tracking or running a duplicated channel heavy compressed under or delay/chorus/dist etc. Although try to get the best sound you can to start with switch mics and pres around.

Posted:
Sat Jul 07, 2007 1:17 pm
by Aearth
Just put the vocal track over a delay set to under 40 ml sec and EQ it.
nIC

Posted:
Sat Jul 07, 2007 3:54 pm
by TimS
Aearth wrote:Just put the vocal track over a delay set to under 40 ml sec and EQ it.
nIC
A little micropitch goes a long way too - about -6 to +6 cents, 10-15% mix..
TimS..

Posted:
Sat Jul 07, 2007 4:52 pm
by rick
cut the bejesus out of the top end so it really sounds dull and send it into a la2a ( or a plugin) untill you have demolished the dynamic range ( say -6 to -10 on the meter)
then boost the bottom end untill it sounds big fat and dull but not woolly ( ie around 100hz but not lower)
then recompress that track with the la2a
so now you should have a lifeless thudding bottom end vocal track
mix that in behind your original track then and limit and eq the both of them as one track
ride every vocal line in the mix with attention to the sound of the combined track
if that does not work out
start wishing you recorded him with more care and thought about the mix:)

Posted:
Sun Jul 08, 2007 1:52 pm
by jkhuri44
ive tried delay stuff and pitch stuff beofre.. but this "vocal thud" track track mixed in with the original sounds interesting..
cant wait to try it,
thanks for that guys :)

Posted:
Sun Jul 08, 2007 9:34 pm
by jamesrocks
Don't know if you've got your desired results now, however there's another thing you could try:
Editing the formants using Melodyne from Celemony or Avox Throat from Antares (I like Melodyne better). Thus you can change the voice's charakter (female to male and vice versa, whatever you like) leaving the pitch untouched. If you don't overdo, you get great results!
Check out
www.celemony.com
A second thing: when you are tracking your vocs, not only the choice of mics and pres is crucial but also where you put the mic!
For thin and nasal voices it's a good method to put it in breast height about 0.5 - 0.8ft away from the chest, pointing to the mouth of the singer. This will make the voice sound fuller. You can also use 2 mics, one on the breast, the second in "normal" position but then you have to take care of phase problems.
Tried that out myself, works well...
Hope that helps!

Posted:
Sun Jul 08, 2007 9:50 pm
by jkhuri44
hey james, no i havent tried that chest voice thing :)
great tip...ill try out very soon..
and the antares plug ive never heard...will track it down!

Posted:
Mon Jul 09, 2007 11:25 am
by Aearth
I'm a big fan double tracking vocals and guitars, try that maybe next time, or get the vocalist to do another pass on another track now then pan tracks hard left and hard right. Makes a huge difference.
nIC

Posted:
Mon Jul 09, 2007 1:43 pm
by jkhuri44
yeah,
ive been beginning to notice alot of music i like has a lot of that sort of double tracked vocal action :P

Posted:
Mon Jul 09, 2007 1:59 pm
by davemc
Aearth wrote:I'm a big fan double tracking vocals and guitars, try that maybe next time, or get the vocalist to do another pass on another track now then pan tracks hard left and hard right. Makes a huge difference.
nIC
yeah I have done this before as well. Although with some vocalists you have a lot of fun trying to get one good track he he
Worked with a girl who would double track and add all harmonies,talk bits etc etc. She had them all worked out in her head and we would do only 1-2 pass's sounded really nice.
If already recorded try the squish vocal underneath as another track, as well as maybe a dist track low underneath, chorus might help, small delays, a amb reverb, the old harmoniser -9 and +9 Left and right trick. There are a few things to try. A nice compressor might do it for you. I used to use my old Neve 2254 for vocals.
Depends on what style just distorting the track might work

Posted:
Wed Jul 18, 2007 11:56 am
by mfdu
i've found i get less of a nasal sound by actually micing above the nose, pointing down to the mouth. about 6 to 12 inches away, season to taste.
(especially to achieve the 'broadcaster' sound)
i also pull out my dark and muddy chinese ribbon mic if i need to really thicken something up - just roll some air in on an eq.
chris
mfdu

Posted:
Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:47 am
by TimS
Question (hopefully not too stupid);
If you had a good to great vox track, but just wanted to thicken it up a little, if you copied the take to a new track, compressed/(EQ'd if needed) it and then blended with original take, would you get phasing issues? Would you need to phase invert the second take/copy?
I'm still getting my head around phasing at the moment.
Sorry if this Q sounds a little basic - just helps makes things clearer in my mind.. I'm a little phased by phasing ;-)
TimS..

Posted:
Thu Jul 19, 2007 12:08 pm
by Chris H
TimS wrote:Question (hopefully not too stupid);
If you had a good to great vox track, but just wanted to thicken it up a little, if you copied the take to a new track, compressed/(EQ'd if needed) it and then blended with original take, would you get phasing issues? Would you need to phase invert the second take/copy?
I'm still getting my head around phasing at the moment.
Sorry if this Q sounds a little basic - just helps makes things clearer in my mind.. I'm a little phased by phasing ;-)
TimS..
Re: Would you need to phase invert the second take/copy? No, the phase issue here would be due to any delay (not echo) caused by the signal going through extra processing. This is not a problem in analogue but occurs in digital when your plugins or audio application does not have automatic delay compensation.
Most software these days has automatic delay compensation, and if there is a problem you will hear it as you add the new processed track. To familiarise yourself with the slightly out of phase sound, turn off any processing on the 2nd track and expand the wave file. The peaks and troughs should be exactly the same as the original file. Now move the copy forward till it is half a trough or peak forward, and listen as you add that chanel to the vox mix.

Posted:
Thu Jul 19, 2007 2:04 pm
by TimS
Chris,
Thanks for the reply.. Will give it a whirl and have a listen..
TimS..

Posted:
Thu Jul 19, 2007 3:00 pm
by Mark Bassett

Posted:
Thu Jul 19, 2007 3:08 pm
by Chris H
Just tried this and found you might have to move the file a bit more forward than what i described earlier. The sound is like the vox is something like as though its through a PVC pipe.

Posted:
Thu Jul 19, 2007 3:44 pm
by TimS
Thats a great article - thanks for the link Mark..
TimS..

Posted:
Thu Jul 19, 2007 3:49 pm
by TimS
Chris H wrote:Just tried this and found you might have to move the file a bit more forward than what i described earlier. The sound is like the vox is something like as though its through a PVC pipe.
Hmm, PVC piping - could be used for effect!! ;-)
Thanks Chris..
TimS..

Posted:
Thu Jul 19, 2007 4:26 pm
by Chris H
TimS wrote:Chris H wrote:Just tried this and found you might have to move the file a bit more forward than what i described earlier. The sound is like the vox is something like as though its through a PVC pipe.
Hmm, PVC piping - could be used for effect!! ;-)
Thanks Chris..
TimS..
Speaking of PVC pipe............ from the sublime to the ridiculous. My boys have just made a " Lemon Cannon".......... it works great.........sounds great...........now i feel compelled to mic it up for a few ballistic samples for my home grown collection

Posted:
Thu Jul 19, 2007 4:30 pm
by TimS
Chris H wrote:TimS wrote:Chris H wrote:Just tried this and found you might have to move the file a bit more forward than what i described earlier. The sound is like the vox is something like as though its through a PVC pipe.
Hmm, PVC piping - could be used for effect!! ;-)
Thanks Chris..
TimS..
Speaking of PVC pipe............ from the sublime to the ridiculous. My boys have just made a " Lemon Cannon".......... it works great.........sounds great...........now i feel compelled to mic it up for a few ballistic samples for my home grown collection
HAHAHAHA - I could just imaging it - would make for a good youtube video too..
:-)
TimS..

Posted:
Thu Jul 19, 2007 6:17 pm
by Mark Bassett
As always, I can relate this to something to do with Tool.
Taken from the Mix article
"The Making of Tool's "10,000 Days" which features an interview with Evil Joe Barresi and mastering engineer Bob Ludwig
"There were other interesting custom-made pieces of gear used on the sessions, such as the “pipe bomb microphone.â€

Posted:
Thu Jul 19, 2007 6:40 pm
by Chris H
Mark Andrew Bassett = The walking talking "Tool" cross reference encyclopedia

Posted:
Thu Jul 19, 2007 7:46 pm
by Mark Bassett
I'm 3 (work) degrees of seperation from MJK, and too many from natalie portman.
In the middle of programming (by hand via midi in tools) the drums patterns to a song of mine playing back out of BFD.
I'm sure there's an easier way, but until my mpc turns up....