Partitioning under OS X.
Hi All,
Hopefully not too difficult a question...
A want to partition my second internal HD on the G5, so that I can have a 20 gig (outer) partiton purely for any current projects that I may be working on as wll as a 140 gig (inner) partiton for Backup.
The reason I want to do this is so that I still get reasonable performance for my current project as the drive fills up.
As I understand it - As drive gets fuller, the data is stored closer to the centre, meaning less diameter at 7200rpm which equals lower data transfer rates.
Seeing as I have already managed to hit the 700gig mark once this month already, thankfully all deleted now, maintaining performance regardless of drive status is vitally important to me.
Under Disk Utility in OS X does anybody know how to determine which partition is the outer and therefore faster when creating them?
Know that this is not a computer tech support forum, Rick and Mark, but thought an answer to this could prove usefull to more than just me.
PS - And Yes I know this would never happen if I used a purely anologue recording method etc etc, for all you smarty pants out there.
Hopefully not too difficult a question...
A want to partition my second internal HD on the G5, so that I can have a 20 gig (outer) partiton purely for any current projects that I may be working on as wll as a 140 gig (inner) partiton for Backup.
The reason I want to do this is so that I still get reasonable performance for my current project as the drive fills up.
As I understand it - As drive gets fuller, the data is stored closer to the centre, meaning less diameter at 7200rpm which equals lower data transfer rates.
Seeing as I have already managed to hit the 700gig mark once this month already, thankfully all deleted now, maintaining performance regardless of drive status is vitally important to me.
Under Disk Utility in OS X does anybody know how to determine which partition is the outer and therefore faster when creating them?
Know that this is not a computer tech support forum, Rick and Mark, but thought an answer to this could prove usefull to more than just me.
PS - And Yes I know this would never happen if I used a purely anologue recording method etc etc, for all you smarty pants out there.