Turtlerock Forum

Here is a configuration seen in use at a music festival. The sound guy
said "he liked the sound of the smaller speakers on top, because they
were brighter and sounded good when blended in with the larger speakers
below...."

LOL

That's a great idea. You should have told him to place the mic at the rear of the head to warm up the sound a bit.

nIC

yeah, closer to the tubes eh? :P

Poor bastard, did you tell him? I wonder how he's gonna feel the day he realises.

must be the good 'ol ignorance is bliss...haha

Okay, we've had the laugh, but what would that top mic be picking up? Amp noises if any ... maybe some ambient spill coming up from the back of the stack and bouncing around? Presumably a bassy sort of thump sound from the front of the stack? Roadie farts?

Can anyone suggest a way in which that mic might pick up anything usable?

Oh, and despite my appalling ignorance in many areas of sound engineering, that wasn't me, in case you''re wondering.

if that mic was picking up anything good, it would have been a "less harsh" sound coming from the cab...

would have taken time to put it in phase with the other mic he's got there....

but generally, mics placed in random places in a room give boomy, big and loose sounds....i dunno if that goes for a mic placed right next to a head!?

when recording a while ago....i was walking around the room, and with my ears, noticed that the really loud stack we were recording sounded beefy and massive from behind a baffle....

i dunno if that experience has anything to do with why that dude miced that amp rig the way he did....

hrm...

I doubt it would be a usable sound, but he also has a 906 or 609 or whatever they're called on the cab. Maybe he pulls the two up together and doesn't notice there's nothing good on one of them!

Howard Jones wrote: The sound guy
said "he liked the sound of the smaller speakers on top, because they
were brighter and sounded good when blended in with the larger speakers
below...."

No no the guy was an egg because he liked the speaker in the amp head or he is obviously an attention seeker, I can see that now, he did it on purpose. Maybe there's a penis thing going on here. But really i think I'll do the same from here on just to keep people talking about it.
Anyway how did the mix sound out in the front of house?
Did he mic-up the drummer's balls, should get a reasonable snare sound from there?

nIC

This was sent to me by a friend, so I didn't get to hear how the sound was improved by this 21 century technique. I hope someone let him down gently.... nuh, I don't.

I'm sure i've seen this picture, or a very similar picture on another forum... but from memory, both mic's were the same, unlike this picture.

I was under the impression that it was showing off a mic clip or adapter that clipped onto the top of the speaker, so you could mic up a stack (With another speaker on top)

But the picture got taken out of context, then spread over the net.

Then there is a version of that same picture with the bottom mic photoshopped out, so it looks like only the amp is mic'd up.

Regards
Mike

did he mike up the bass player's DI Box?

astrovic wrote:did he mike up the bass player's DI Box?

:-)

Maybe it's a band thing.........Did he mic the singers arse?

LOL! I'd like one of these every Monday morning please!

Chris H wrote:Maybe it's a band thing.........Did he mic the singers arse?

He tried to, but when the singer cleared his throat, he shat on the mic.............

;-}

tunetown wrote:

Chris H wrote:Maybe it's a band thing.........Did he mic the singers arse?

He tried to, but when the singer cleared his throat, he shat on the mic.............

;-}

Sure 57 on vox too i bet!...............
Didn't i read in the latest AT that Pete Murry sang into a 57 on his latest CD?

Chris H wrote:

tunetown wrote:

Chris H wrote:Maybe it's a band thing.........Did he mic the singers arse?

He tried to, but when the singer cleared his throat, he shat on the mic.............

;-}

Sure 57 on vox too i bet!...............
Didn't i read in the latest AT that Pete Murry sang into a 57 on his latest CD?

Yep, you sure did!!
Its not a bad CD at that either - I like it!!