Kris wrote:So who decides what's a reasonable amount to pay? You? I'm sure that if the client was the one to decide what rate of pay should be applied to any service then we'd all be in dire straits. Can I come to your studio and tell you how much I want to pay even if it's below your rate, just because I think you're charging too much? I think not.
Well that's easy. I decide how much I'm prepared to pay. The supplier of the service decides how much they want to charge. When the two meet, a transaction happens.
If I believe the amount charged is reasonable, then I'll accept it. If I decide it's not reasonable, then I won't and I'll probably look elsewhere. Simple economics really.
If I think the price is too high everywhere (or I can't afford it) then nothing gets done and I live with broken equipment, which is the price I pay for being a tight-arse.
I've set a rate at the studio as I believe that's what it's worth. If you come and decide that you're only willing to pay less, then I'll tell you to look elsewhere. You can tell me whatever you want about rates, it's my choice about what I decide to charge.
I didn't approach techs and tell them they charge too much and that I'm only prepared to pay $X dollars per hour. I just went elsewhere, which is the polite thing to do really.
As for the "whatever they ask"....obviously I'm talking within reason. As for the abiltiy of the tech, I simply aligned the skill of the tech with the rate of pay. As an example, I've approached a Nashville based engineer to mix a song for me. Let's not argue over using a US mix engineer.... my reasons are my reasons..... but he has quoted me a price and I will not dare try and haggle him down. To do so would be an insult and would make me look like a tool (or a bigger tool....depends on who you talk to). Why would he do my mix for less money when he's doing gold and platinum albums every other week? You want the best then it's going to cost you. In some cases it may well be overcooked but usually it's quite within reason.
This really depends on what sort of service you're talking about. If I want a tech to come and fix something, that's what I expect to happen. There are standards that I expect when carrying out this work, but it's not very subjective (either the thing is fixed, or it is not fixed). Easily quantifyable. So in effect I've got competent techs charging differing amounts. Why would I choose the more expensive option?