Page 1 of 1
conversion to transformer-balanced in/out?

Posted:
Sat Jul 25, 2009 4:35 pm
by mfdu
so i've got two four band parametric eq's. Jands JP4's. yeah i know, pretty agricultural.
currently in/out is unbalanced.
what trannies should i get to run it transformer balanced in/out? so +4 balanced>-10unbalanced / -10unbalanced>+4 balanced.
and flying leads would be better than pcb mount.
i think some trannies could be all these units needs to give them a bit of X.
i've got a few bits and bobs laying around, but i doubt anything i have would suit.
i haven't done any shopping on this myself yet - just seeking thoghts.
chris.

Posted:
Sat Jul 25, 2009 7:03 pm
by Roy
Sorry I can't help, mfdu. But I'm also interested to know.
Re: conversion to transformer-balanced in/out?

Posted:
Sat Jul 25, 2009 7:05 pm
by Gian
mfdu wrote:so i've got two four band parametric eq's. Jands JP4's. yeah i know, pretty agricultural.
currently in/out is unbalanced.
what trannies should i get to run it transformer balanced in/out? so +4 balanced>-10unbalanced / -10unbalanced>+4 balanced.
and flying leads would be better than pcb mount.
i think some trannies could be all these units needs to give them a bit of X.
i've got a few bits and bobs laying around, but i doubt anything i have would suit.
i haven't done any shopping on this myself yet - just seeking thoghts.
chris.
How about a jlm dINgO kit
http://www.jlmaudio.com/dINgO.htm
http://www.jlmaudio.com/shop/index.php? ... oductId=44

Posted:
Sat Jul 25, 2009 7:18 pm
by rob
yep you need gain shifting and balancing. JLM dINgO with or without the JLM111DC output transformer will do all this.
however you are certain that the units are -10 operating level?
A lot of people get confused between levels and balancing. Unbalanced on it's own doesn't say anything about operating level and visa versa

Posted:
Sun Jul 26, 2009 4:01 pm
by mfdu
i understand why the dingoe, but i'm really hoping for a passive solution. why? because!
i'll check the levels soo, but if it were simply balanced > unbal / unbal > bal, then would a simple trannie work?
c.

Posted:
Sun Jul 26, 2009 4:10 pm
by rob
yes

Posted:
Sun Jul 26, 2009 6:28 pm
by Gian
mfdu wrote:i understand why the dingoe, but i'm really hoping for a passive solution. why? because!
i'll check the levels soo, but if it were simply balanced > unbal / unbal > bal, then would a simple trannie work?
c.
You could use a passive DI for unbalanced to balanced.

Posted:
Mon Jul 27, 2009 12:10 am
by Futureman
Gian wrote:You could use a passive DI for unbalanced to balanced.
Isn't that what is inside a passive DI? A transformer?

Posted:
Mon Jul 27, 2009 8:18 am
by rob
indeed if the unit is unbalanced in and out and operates at a -10dBu operating level, then this is an ideal candidate for applying our new
Missing Link.
see here :
http://www.broadcastproaudio.com/new.htm
read the operation sheet to get your head around it's operation, but in essence it is a perfect device for interfacing instrument and domestic level unbalanced equipment to balanced +4 setups. And you get a DI and reamp to boot.

Posted:
Mon Jul 27, 2009 10:21 am
by rick
if you find out that you just need line in line out trannies, ie unity gain
i have boxes of them - i just about cannot give them away :)
send me $50 and a yellow express bag and i will send you ( or anybody )
a stereo set of really high quality high headroom
australian made nos transformers hell i will even chuck a few more in if you want them .
i have at least 100 they work really well , NOS australian made ASTOR - from the 60 / 70s
i should have some sowters somewhere as well as well but people are keener to pay a bit more money for them
( dunno why the astors are as good probably better.)

Posted:
Mon Jul 27, 2009 1:46 pm
by mfdu
rick - the last grab-bag of trannies i got off you were great - the astor green-cans are very promising (currently using as output trannies on a pair of JLM BA's), and you can expect an self-addressed envelope on its way to you shortly.
i'll be after four at least - more if that's how you're feeling on the day.
you might as well start gathering up the culprits now.
(PM me your preferred postage address)
if the cans dont get a gurnsey on this, then they'll get a run on the next project, or the one after that . . .
i know it's cutting a purse from a sows ear, but i think the balancing trannies will gives these eq's some much needed mojo.
rob - i hear you on the missing link. but the ideal right now is to hard-mount something in the boxes, as i wont use them without the balanced in/out. that's why an external DI isnt what i'm after either.

Posted:
Mon Jul 27, 2009 2:35 pm
by rick
i can never remember who i have done one of those deals with and who i havent , have you got any model numbers on the ones i sent you that you would like some more of again ?
just send your postbag to turtlerock
17 gibbens street 2050
trannies...

Posted:
Mon Jul 27, 2009 4:57 pm
by mylesgm
Hi Rick Could I grab a set of trannies too? I've got a deane jensen eq needing some love in the racking department. thats transformers cause I'm straight no chaser...
myles

Posted:
Wed Jul 29, 2009 2:24 pm
by mfdu
rick - it'll be a week or two. my car got totalled on monday night, so everything else has to drop down a rung in priorities.
hope you understand.
chris.

Posted:
Wed Aug 05, 2009 10:23 pm
by Andrew
Just wanted to chip in as well..I got some transformers off Rick a while ago to sort out balancing the outputs on a desk and used the rest on some other bits that needed them. They've worked out fantasticly for my applications. Might have to get so more soon.
Andrew
knob twiddler and solder smolderer

Posted:
Wed Aug 05, 2009 11:35 pm
by rick
if you want some just send me a return express bag pifty aussie bucks and state your needs
you will get what you get , but i have never been know to let a forum member down yet :)
an email to tell me the baggy is on the way will help remind me as well