If things are slow.. How low will you go.
Or, are you charging a 1/3rd less this year.. etc.
Actual details not requested, just opinions.
In response to some advertised chrissy deals that are out and about.

Moderators: rick, Mark Bassett






. That particular "client" asked for "a" and when I provided him "a" he started whinging that he really wanted "b". 
Are you a business or a charity?




ChrisW wrote:As for a new studio, not yet open. I think it's not a bad idea to run a couple of free sessions at first (hopefully with friends), to iron out problems and to identify potential annoyances to proper paying clients.
Call it a dry run with guinea pigs.







mylesgm wrote:Its been quite awhile since I played the deal game or worked for free because someone asked me to. I've worked for free because I wanted to, sometimes I've offered a deal because I wanted to secure the work and sometimes I've simply not sent the invoice because I decided to do the work gratis however if someone asks me to do some work for them I tell them my rate and then they either agree or not. Its been awhile since someone that wanted to work with me passed because of my rate and I've raised that rate by 5 bucks an hour every 12 months for 3-4 years. Sure I've missed out on a few gigs because someone didn't have the money or someones friend will do it for free but these clients usually don't benefit me in the long run anyway. In fact the only time I've been screwed over recently was by someone who I wanted to work with who didn't have the money at the time so I did the work with an agreement to get paid later when they did have money they screwed me. People who want something for free don't value you and either value themselves very highly or don't value their music enough to really invest.
I treat downtime as enforced holidays (which I need) and I've still had plenty of work, still paid the bills. If people value YOUR services then they will pay reasonable rates regardless of your equipment (within reason) or the studio.
In my experience studios dont make money but individuals do.
+1
mylesgm wrote:In my experience studios dont make money but individuals do.




mylesgm wrote:which last I heard was a massive sinkhole for money...


The Tasmanian wrote:its the old business model that does not work - the studio does attract business - lots of it.



Manning wrote:mylesgm wrote:which last I heard was a massive sinkhole for money...
Yes, indeed. it needed McCartney and Lloyd-Webber to make noise so as to prevent it being turned into "luxury apartments". The site has now been protected by the UK National Trust, meaning it can't be redeveloped. However it still has to make money somehow.



jkhuri44 wrote:i'd do audio work for $25 an hour...beats the shit out of working in a f*ck'n office.



Chris H wrote:On topic in the Age today:
http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/societ ... 1n5dt.html

Return to The Turtlerock Forum
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests