Guitar Delay Pedal.

An audio community like no other.

Moderators: rick, Mark Bassett

Guitar Delay Pedal.

Postby Futureman » Tue Aug 05, 2008 8:38 pm

User avatar
Futureman
Frequent Contributor
Frequent Contributor
 
Posts: 995
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 4:47 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Guitar Delay Pedal.

Postby Thirteen » Tue Aug 05, 2008 8:48 pm

Futureman wrote:http://cgi.ebay.com.au/Sony-delay-for-cutting-vinyl_W0QQitemZ120290848290QQihZ002QQcategoryZ3278QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

Would this sound good on my strat?


Not likely, just a delay, no taps.
User avatar
Thirteen
TRM Endorsed
TRM Endorsed
 
Posts: 1279
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 5:08 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Guitar Delay Pedal.

Postby Futureman » Tue Aug 05, 2008 8:56 pm

Thirteen wrote:
Not likely, just a delay, no taps.



aaaawww.. it was a joke...
User avatar
Futureman
Frequent Contributor
Frequent Contributor
 
Posts: 995
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 4:47 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby jkhuri44 » Tue Aug 05, 2008 9:43 pm

it would sound good on ur strat, if you wanna sound like ur playing 50 ms behind the rest of the band :P
jkhuri44
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 2537
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 10:53 pm
Location: Dundas

Postby smash » Wed Aug 06, 2008 2:45 am

it would sound good on ur strat, if you wanna sound like ur playing 50 ms behind the rest of the band :P


Nah - It would just bring the guitar back into time with the rest of the band ;-)
smash
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 443
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 12:49 am
Location: Northern Beaches, Sydney

Postby heathen » Wed Aug 06, 2008 9:53 am

smash wrote:
it would sound good on ur strat, if you wanna sound like ur playing 50 ms behind the rest of the band :P


Nah - It would just bring the guitar back into time with the rest of the band ;-)



Perfect then. :)
User avatar
heathen
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
 
Posts: 1745
Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 11:15 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby otto ruiter » Wed Aug 06, 2008 11:45 am

50mSec ?

If memory serves it has two settings - 1.8 sec and 1.33 seconds, equal to 1 turn each of a 33.3 rpm and 45 rpm disc respectively!

otto
otto ruiter
 

Postby Chinagraf » Wed Aug 06, 2008 2:17 pm

Pardon my ignoramusness, but why would you use a delay on a cutting lathe? (I know SFA about pressing vinyl, we've always just sent it off)
THanks
User avatar
Chinagraf
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
 
Posts: 1608
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 1:09 am
Location: Melbourne

Postby otto ruiter » Wed Aug 06, 2008 3:14 pm

Chinagraf wrote:Pardon my ignoramusness, but why would you use a delay on a cutting lathe? (I know SFA about pressing vinyl, we've always just sent it off)
THanks


Well, the cutting lathe needs to know what program is coming up so that the groove spacing can be adjusted accordingly. This used to be accomplished by having extra play heads on the replay tapedeck. The gap between the "pre-listen" heads and the "program" heads could be adjusted by looping the tape around different rollers between the two heads, to allow for different combinations of tape speed and disc rpm. When digital sources first became available there was no method to provide a "pre-listen" output to control the lathe, so it was usually done by doing a listening pass of the program and making notes so the lathe could be "driven" manually. Later on the Sony DDU series of delays became available so that the un-delayed output could be used to drive the lathe pre-listen circuits, while the delayed output became the program feed to the cutting chain. The delay did not affect the quality of the program because it was already 44k1/16bit coming from the 1610 or 1630 processor, but for the same reason they're pretty useless these days.

hope that makes some sort of sense...

otto
otto ruiter
 

Postby Chinagraf » Thu Aug 07, 2008 11:19 am

Thanks for the explanation Otto, makes sense. So I guess tha means that all later vinyls were actually vinyl pressings of a 16bit 44.1K recording....
User avatar
Chinagraf
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
 
Posts: 1608
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 1:09 am
Location: Melbourne

Postby rick » Thu Aug 07, 2008 11:52 am

later ...? yes as in from say 1985 onwards and i would say from 1988 everything bar the specially mentioned audiophile type releases ,
we used to make or get from overseasd an eqd 1603 of the analog tapes and then cut fron that that we thoughtit was magaic way betterthen cutting from a 1/4" dolby A eqd copy of the masters ~
User avatar
rick
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 3486
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 8:02 pm
Location: Sydney


Return to The Turtlerock Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests