ITB Cubase/Nuendo Question...

An audio community like no other.

Moderators: rick, Mark Bassett

ITB Cubase/Nuendo Question...

Postby jkhuri44 » Wed Sep 24, 2008 10:35 pm

hey guys...

I've got a lead vocal, which i'm sending out to a main reverb...half way through the mix, i decided i wanted to blend in distortion for a few phrases, so i routed a send, to a distortion VST....


When i go to the Channel Parameters of the distortion, and click the sends panel (to send it out to the main reverb...the only option i get to send to is analog outs....)

question is....why cant I send from a send channel....
please dont tell me its not possible in Nuendo/Cubase :P

obviously, a simple solution to this would be to duplicate my lead vocal, put the distortion there as an insert, then send that to the main reverb...but i would like to do this without creating more tracks...to preserve CPU..i am working in 24/96.
jkhuri44
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 2537
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 10:53 pm
Location: Dundas

Postby Thirteen » Wed Sep 24, 2008 11:07 pm

Which version of Cubase are you using? I think that only the later versions can route FX to FX. If you make a group channel and put the distortion on it as an insert, you may find that it will give you the extra routing that you need.
User avatar
Thirteen
TRM Endorsed
TRM Endorsed
 
Posts: 1279
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 5:08 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby jkhuri44 » Wed Sep 24, 2008 11:15 pm

cubase SX 3...

not recent enough ?? :(
jkhuri44
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 2537
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 10:53 pm
Location: Dundas

Postby jkhuri44 » Wed Sep 24, 2008 11:18 pm

oh, i dont think u can route an FX track to a Group...if thats what ur getting at?
jkhuri44
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 2537
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 10:53 pm
Location: Dundas

Postby Thirteen » Wed Sep 24, 2008 11:23 pm

OK, I just tried in Nuendo 4, if you make a group track, it appears on the list of available sends along with the FX channels. so you could maybe put the distortion in an insert slot on the group track, and then pull the level of the group down and use a pre-fade send on the group to go to the reverb.

I hope that makes sense, I really should have been in bed a half hour ago. What I am getting at is that group tracks are more routable that FX tracks, so maybe it is better to use them instead.
User avatar
Thirteen
TRM Endorsed
TRM Endorsed
 
Posts: 1279
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 5:08 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby jkhuri44 » Wed Sep 24, 2008 11:38 pm

i see...lemme try that

:)
jkhuri44
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 2537
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 10:53 pm
Location: Dundas

Postby Roy » Wed Sep 24, 2008 11:39 pm

Not quite sure what you mean... are you trying to distort the reverb??? If you're using Nuendo then don't worry... anything is possible... it's better than most Tools used by Pros.
Roy
Registered User
Registered User
 
Posts: 113
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 12:46 am
Location: Sydney

Postby jkhuri44 » Wed Sep 24, 2008 11:40 pm

nah roy, i wanna reverberate the distortion...


so, imagine lead vocal + a bit of distortion, both being sent to a reverb....without creating a duplicate track for the distortion.
jkhuri44
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 2537
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 10:53 pm
Location: Dundas

Postby Roy » Wed Sep 24, 2008 11:50 pm

So you wanna reverberate the distortion? Cool. So you wanna send an effect to another effect? Well I use Nuendo 3 and that's totally possible. You can even choose whether it's pre or post. I can't recall it in a step by step instruction off hand... I'll check it out tomorrow and let you know if no one else replies by then.
Roy
Registered User
Registered User
 
Posts: 113
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 12:46 am
Location: Sydney

Postby jkhuri44 » Thu Sep 25, 2008 12:46 am

please do roy....that would be greatly appreciated....:)

its annoying the shit out of me why i cant work it out, or what the dudes at Steinberg have done to make it so hard!!
jkhuri44
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 2537
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 10:53 pm
Location: Dundas

Postby heathen » Thu Sep 25, 2008 6:55 am

Or you could just put the dist vst on the vocal insert bypass the dist until needed and automate it in. I've wanted to send fx to fx before with no joy, so I just automate.
User avatar
heathen
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
 
Posts: 1745
Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 11:15 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby TimS » Thu Sep 25, 2008 11:05 am

heathen wrote:Or you could just put the dist vst on the vocal insert bypass the dist until needed and automate it in. I've wanted to send fx to fx before with no joy, so I just automate.

JK,
Thats what I would do also - much simpler and easier (and a lot less routing to boot!!)
I agree with Heath on the automation..
T..
User avatar
TimS
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
 
Posts: 1734
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 3:11 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby jkhuri44 » Thu Sep 25, 2008 12:12 pm

yeah, there are a few work arounds, i mentioned one above as well...

in this case an insert would work, in other cases.....like sending a delay to a reverb....automation wouldnt work...

so, this is more a question that hopefully will help me for the long run....technically i want all these tracks to be related, so i can set and forget em at the start, then go back and tweak later.
jkhuri44
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 2537
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 10:53 pm
Location: Dundas

Postby Kurt » Thu Sep 25, 2008 3:25 pm

I use Sonar not Cubase but I guess these ideas would work in any DAW.

1) Split the track so that the section you want distorted is isolated, put a clip effect on it (rather than the whole track)
2) create a second fx send, copy the reverb setting, add the distortion, automate the track fx sends accordingly
3) Move the section where distortion is needed to a new track, set up a track insert with the distortion, use same fx send for reverb
4) Use Reaper, send anything anywhere!

All are more complicated than Heath's solution!
User avatar
Kurt
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
 
Posts: 1235
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 1:02 am
Location: Canberra

Postby jkhuri44 » Thu Sep 25, 2008 3:41 pm

yeah, i can add distortion to a clip in cubase...but i dont want to print the effect, i'd like my mix to stay tweakable.


and also, i dont want to make a new track for anything...i've already started maxing my 2496 sessions :(


the bummer is i want to automate the distortion volume, so heaths solution doesnt work, as there will never be a time when the distortion is off.

i know how to do this stuff in ProStools. coz they use Auxillary tracks which seem to be routable to anywhere.... but cubase seems to be trickier.

and yes, i am being a tricky little bitch, and yall luv it!
jkhuri44
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 2537
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 10:53 pm
Location: Dundas

Postby jkhuri44 » Thu Sep 25, 2008 3:42 pm

still waiting roy, if you'say youve done this before...i wanna see...!!!

i need a reason not to jump to reaper...and u may be providing it...hehehe
jkhuri44
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 2537
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 10:53 pm
Location: Dundas

Postby Kurt » Thu Sep 25, 2008 3:44 pm

You can't leave a clip effect to run in real-time?
In Sonar you could load the effect non-destructively, then automate it's parameters (eg. output volume) Never occured to me that Cubase wouldn't let you do that. Sorry.

New solution.... Buy Sonar, Reaper or Protools, bin Cubase ;)
User avatar
Kurt
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
 
Posts: 1235
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 1:02 am
Location: Canberra

Postby jkhuri44 » Thu Sep 25, 2008 3:51 pm

hey kurt, in cubase, u'd use inserts....or destructively add an effect to a clip.
jkhuri44
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 2537
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 10:53 pm
Location: Dundas

Postby Kurt » Thu Sep 25, 2008 4:06 pm

In Sonar I can add an effect to a clip and either have it run in realtime or apply it destructively.

jkhuri44 wrote:hey kurt, in cubase, u'd use inserts....or destructively add an effect to a clip.
User avatar
Kurt
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
 
Posts: 1235
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 1:02 am
Location: Canberra

Postby jkhuri44 » Thu Sep 25, 2008 4:08 pm

yeah, that would be nice!

lol, whats up with these companies not providing common sense shit, it drives me batty!!
jkhuri44
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 2537
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 10:53 pm
Location: Dundas

Postby TimS » Thu Sep 25, 2008 5:45 pm

Use Pro Fools then JK...
User avatar
TimS
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
 
Posts: 1734
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 3:11 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby jkhuri44 » Thu Sep 25, 2008 5:49 pm

cant Tim, LE has its share of probs too...cant work properly in 24 96, and not enough tracks.
jkhuri44
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 2537
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 10:53 pm
Location: Dundas

Postby heathen » Thu Sep 25, 2008 5:50 pm

You should be able to automate any parameters on the dist in cubase, such as drive or output level, what dist plug you using?

Anyway stop bitchin and just print the thing. :)
User avatar
heathen
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
 
Posts: 1745
Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 11:15 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby jkhuri44 » Thu Sep 25, 2008 5:52 pm

i aint bitchin, im still waiitng to be shown how to do it...!


im using waves GTR distortion :)
im not putting that on the vocals as an insert!!

if i do that, might as well have not processed with all that sweet hardware!
jkhuri44
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 2537
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 10:53 pm
Location: Dundas

Postby TimS » Thu Sep 25, 2008 5:53 pm

heathen wrote:Anyway stop bitchin and just print the thing. :)

hehehe - yeah, do as he says!!

fair enuf JK - what sort of session is it?
User avatar
TimS
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
 
Posts: 1734
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 3:11 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby jkhuri44 » Thu Sep 25, 2008 5:56 pm

hey tim,

its the vocal mix for my album.

this is the first time i've mixed outside of PT HD. so im looking for all the features i'd normally carry out in HD, in cubase.

J.
jkhuri44
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 2537
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 10:53 pm
Location: Dundas

Postby jkhuri44 » Thu Sep 25, 2008 5:57 pm

oh, if i were to do it LE, i would be below the track count...but the session prob wont play....or will glitch as soon as i add 1 instance of heavy duty reverb, etc.
jkhuri44
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 2537
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 10:53 pm
Location: Dundas

Postby heathen » Thu Sep 25, 2008 6:02 pm

How much is cubase 4? Doh
User avatar
heathen
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
 
Posts: 1745
Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 11:15 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby TimS » Thu Sep 25, 2008 6:02 pm

jkhuri44 wrote:oh, if i were to do it LE, i would be below the track count...but the session prob wont play....or will glitch as soon as i add 1 instance of heavy duty reverb, etc.

You need the MPT for LE then... Up to 48 tracks..

From Digi website;

Multi-track Beat Detective rhythm analysis and correction tool

Up to 48 mono or stereo tracks at up to 96 kHz (Requires 96 kHz–capable Digidesign or M-Audio® hardware)

Pro Tools MP3 Option

Would do the trick for you in LE. I run the same..
User avatar
TimS
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
 
Posts: 1734
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 3:11 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby TimS » Thu Sep 25, 2008 6:04 pm

If your going the Steinberg route, go with Nuendo. Its awesome (I am an old Cubase user from way back and Nuendo looks fab - Peter uses it)
User avatar
TimS
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
 
Posts: 1734
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 3:11 pm
Location: Sydney

Next

Return to The Turtlerock Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests