automating compression

A place to ask the basic questions, a place for students, newbies, and everyone else.

Moderators: rick, Mark Bassett

automating compression

Postby jithknot » Thu Aug 27, 2009 11:11 pm

i was playing around with a track and was trying to automate compression at odd places. but it just failed
is it even logical to automate compression??
Jithin Chand
User avatar
jithknot
Registered User
Registered User
 
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 11:24 am
Location: Sydney

comp

Postby jkhuri44 » Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:05 am

very logical to automate...at times.

for example....automating something at its tail ,,,simultaneously easing off threshold, make up and ratio at the end of a track during a fade out...

one example...of many.

end of the day, there are 100 ways to do something ...the right way is the way that sounds right!

i dont find myself doing this much though,,,only in special cases.
Jamil Khuri
Amusement & Audio Engineer
"it's not awesome unless its 240bpm with distorted 909 kicks!"
jkhuri44
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 2537
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 10:53 pm
Location: Dundas

Postby jithknot » Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:18 am

so how do you go about automating something thats in the middle of a track?? (lets say a song)

when i tried, there was a dynamic "fluctuation" (i.e volume dropped and then rose back) right after the automated region.
Jithin Chand
User avatar
jithknot
Registered User
Registered User
 
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 11:24 am
Location: Sydney

comp

Postby jkhuri44 » Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:26 am

u need to draw smooth curves, over a long time....

ie, fast automation is gonna sound....like a quick fluctuation....
Jamil Khuri
Amusement & Audio Engineer
"it's not awesome unless its 240bpm with distorted 909 kicks!"
jkhuri44
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 2537
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 10:53 pm
Location: Dundas

Postby heathen » Fri Aug 28, 2009 8:15 am

If you're automating threshold you'll need to automate (probably) the output gain as well.
Heath Smith
User avatar
heathen
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
 
Posts: 1745
Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 11:15 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby chris p » Fri Aug 28, 2009 9:43 am

If you are using plugins, or own a rack full of Smart C2s (or other compressors of your choice), you can get similar results by using multiple compressors flexibly: things like modified sidechaining, parallel compression, serial compression (which multiplies the comp ratios, remember, so 5:1 following by 2:1 = 10:1 overall) or even, to quote Micheal Stavrou (and risk incurring the wrath of RO'N), backwards compression. Compression is not always intuitive: try using a brickwall limiter setting ahead of your more gentle compression even though your instinct may be to have them the other way around.

It all depends on what you are trying to do with the mix, and how compression works. What is the mix issue that leads you to try automating the compression parameters?
Chris Preston

The man who gives meaning to the word "amateur"
User avatar
chris p
Frequent Contributor
Frequent Contributor
 
Posts: 882
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 6:15 pm
Location: Sydney, NSW

Postby jithknot » Fri Aug 28, 2009 3:14 pm

well its just that in the song the high strings of the clean guitar sound very loud, at the same time if i eq it, the distorted guitar in the background suffers, so when i compressed it, it sounded better, but after goin out of that part, it would compress things that i didnt want to get compressed.
its a song thats already mastered, and particularly has a lot of compression in it.
thats one of the reasons, and a couple of other parts have similar problems.
i was just trying my hand in mastering :P
not very good at it. but just for the sake of experimentation :)
Jithin Chand
User avatar
jithknot
Registered User
Registered User
 
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 11:24 am
Location: Sydney

Postby chris p » Fri Aug 28, 2009 3:35 pm

Try a multiband compressor - it splits the audio into frequency bands, and compress each separately. You can tame those medium high freqs while leaving the rest of the mix pretty much as is.
Chris Preston

The man who gives meaning to the word "amateur"
User avatar
chris p
Frequent Contributor
Frequent Contributor
 
Posts: 882
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 6:15 pm
Location: Sydney, NSW

Postby Kurt » Fri Aug 28, 2009 3:38 pm

de-esser maybe?

jithknot wrote:well its just that in the song the high strings of the clean guitar sound very loud, at the same time if i eq it, the distorted guitar in the background suffers, so when i compressed it, it sounded better, but after goin out of that part, it would compress things that i didnt want to get compressed.
its a song thats already mastered, and particularly has a lot of compression in it.
thats one of the reasons, and a couple of other parts have similar problems.
i was just trying my hand in mastering :P
not very good at it. but just for the sake of experimentation :)
Kurt Neist
Chief cook and bottle washer - Metalworx
User avatar
Kurt
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
 
Posts: 1235
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 1:02 am
Location: Canberra

Postby jithknot » Fri Aug 28, 2009 3:46 pm

hmm yeah, if i could get my hands on a multiband compressor, i would try it. :)
would a dynamic EQ do the same job??
and de esser?? hmm ill try it out
thanks of the advice everyone :)
Jithin Chand
User avatar
jithknot
Registered User
Registered User
 
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 11:24 am
Location: Sydney

Postby Chinagraf » Fri Aug 28, 2009 4:07 pm

Since you can't probably afford a Weiss, what about Waves Q10 or Q4 etc. Very tighty on the bandwidth, goes to a hundred..
User avatar
Chinagraf
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
 
Posts: 1608
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 1:09 am
Location: Melbourne

Postby Kurt » Fri Aug 28, 2009 4:12 pm

http://www.geocities.jp/webmaster_of_sss/vst/#c3

Here's a freeware 3 band compressor for win/mac. Haven't tried it though.
Kurt Neist
Chief cook and bottle washer - Metalworx
User avatar
Kurt
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
 
Posts: 1235
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 1:02 am
Location: Canberra

Re: automating compression

Postby lonearranger » Fri Aug 28, 2009 5:28 pm

jithknot wrote:i was playing around with a track and was trying to automate compression at odd places. but it just failed
is it even logical to automate compression??


Can you tell us what program/platform you are on and what the problem you are trying to solve is? Which compresser are you tring to automate.

Cheers
Michael Luchich
Alternation.com.au
Walcha NSW
lonearranger
Registered User
Registered User
 
Posts: 217
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Walcha NSW

Postby jithknot » Fri Aug 28, 2009 5:34 pm

mac osx, protools LE 8, and was trying to automate the bf 1176 plugin
Jithin Chand
User avatar
jithknot
Registered User
Registered User
 
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 11:24 am
Location: Sydney

Postby lonearranger » Fri Aug 28, 2009 5:58 pm

jithknot wrote:mac osx, protools LE 8, and was trying to automate the bf 1176 plugin


But what is the problem you are trying to solve with the compression?

Would automating the pre compressor and post compresser volume be of any use.

Cheers
Michael Luchich
Alternation.com.au
Walcha NSW
lonearranger
Registered User
Registered User
 
Posts: 217
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Walcha NSW

Postby Kurt » Fri Aug 28, 2009 6:05 pm

You could just cut the section you want treated differently onto a different track and compress it separately.
Kurt Neist
Chief cook and bottle washer - Metalworx
User avatar
Kurt
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
 
Posts: 1235
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 1:02 am
Location: Canberra


Return to You've gotta start somewhere.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


cron