- It is currently Wed Jul 29, 2026 8:56 am • All times are UTC + 10 hours [ DST ]
Top 3 Most Annoying Pro Tools 8 Bugs
Moderators: rick, Mark Bassett
18 posts
• Page 1 of 1
-

Mark Bassett - Forum Admin

- Posts: 540
- Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 6:15 pm
Just read this and the update mentioned at the bottom of the article
[Quote]
"UPDATE: I had a message on my phone this morning from Avid Audio/Digidesign Technical Support about this post. The C24 issue I was having has been logged as a bug for a fix in the next update (most likely 8.0.4 since 8.0.3 is closed). The “remove a send, lose your Undoâ€
[Quote]
"UPDATE: I had a message on my phone this morning from Avid Audio/Digidesign Technical Support about this post. The C24 issue I was having has been logged as a bug for a fix in the next update (most likely 8.0.4 since 8.0.3 is closed). The “remove a send, lose your Undoâ€
Chris Hallam.
https://soundcloud.com/hallamsound
Whatever floats your boat.
https://soundcloud.com/hallamsound
Whatever floats your boat.
-

Chris H - Forum Veteran

- Posts: 2321
- Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 11:20 am
- Location: Off The Planet
geofflee wrote:Just set up your templates with a trim in the first slot (already set to polarity invert but bypassed).Mark Andrew Bassett wrote:Polarity invert button...
Sure that'll do the job, but that's one less plug space I could be using.
I could just flip it in audiosuite too, but I'm after a non-convoluted solution.
Just put the button above the fader, in the fader, don't care.
-

Mark Bassett - Forum Admin

- Posts: 540
- Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 6:15 pm
geofflee wrote:Just set up your templates with a trim in the first slot (already set to polarity invert but bypassed).Mark Andrew Bassett wrote:Polarity invert button...
Greetings all, why do you do it that way,(polarity invert but bypassed) rather than simply press the invert button on the trimmer? any advantages? many thanks,
Mick Fairlie
- thefridge
- Registered User

- Posts: 16
- Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 11:32 am
- Location: Newcastle
Because it's not necessary to call up the plugin and then hit the invert button, you just command click the trim slot (taking it out of bypass and phase flipping the channel). Not that I do this myself, but it's a way of having a row of polarity flip buttons if you set up templates like this.thefridge wrote:geofflee wrote:Just set up your templates with a trim in the first slot (already set to polarity invert but bypassed).Mark Andrew Bassett wrote:Polarity invert button...
Greetings all, why do you do it that way,(polarity invert but bypassed) rather than simply press the invert button on the trimmer? any advantages? many thanks,
Mick Fairlie
Geoff Lee
- geofflee
- Registered User

- Posts: 55
- Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 11:47 pm
- Location: sydney nsw
lol, protools bugs and missing features.
i dont wanna start...well i kinda do, blame mark though :P
include F@#$ing timecode and polarity invert, almost all friggin companies in software do that....for FREE!!!
maybe 8 has added free timecode, maybe not.
The above are not bugs, thats shitty software. Problems with main features are simply not bugs...removing a send and loosing your undo should be picked up on pretty quickly by good beta testing... f@#$s sake, i could be wrong, but thats a pretty major "bug".
What's more embarassing is that this is the supposed "industry standard software".
i dont wanna start...well i kinda do, blame mark though :P
include F@#$ing timecode and polarity invert, almost all friggin companies in software do that....for FREE!!!
maybe 8 has added free timecode, maybe not.
The above are not bugs, thats shitty software. Problems with main features are simply not bugs...removing a send and loosing your undo should be picked up on pretty quickly by good beta testing... f@#$s sake, i could be wrong, but thats a pretty major "bug".
What's more embarassing is that this is the supposed "industry standard software".
Jamil Khuri
Amusement & Audio Engineer
"it's not awesome unless its 240bpm with distorted 909 kicks!"
Amusement & Audio Engineer
"it's not awesome unless its 240bpm with distorted 909 kicks!"
- jkhuri44
- Forum Veteran

- Posts: 2537
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 10:53 pm
- Location: Dundas
Hi there,
8 haha !
I am still happy in 7.3.1 land (ok...I may upgrade when the NEW system comes...
after a few revs ;-)
8 is just the *inbetweener* !
Cheers
N
Y
M
O
8 haha !
I am still happy in 7.3.1 land (ok...I may upgrade when the NEW system comes...
after a few revs ;-)
8 is just the *inbetweener* !
Cheers
N
Y
M
O
John NYMo Nyman
Not too old to Rock n Roll...not too young to die !
Not too old to Rock n Roll...not too young to die !
- NYMo
- Valued Contributor

- Posts: 1023
- Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 1:54 pm
- Location: Sunshine Coast Queensland
-

Mark Bassett - Forum Admin

- Posts: 540
- Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 6:15 pm
WHy can't daw designers put a variable phase pot on the top of the mixer strip instead of just a polarity invert?
I mean like what year is it.. would be handier than all the ssl mix buss compressor emolations they keep making.
I mean like what year is it.. would be handier than all the ssl mix buss compressor emolations they keep making.
Andy Evans
http://www.mud.net.au
http://www.mud.net.au
-

Chinagraf - Valued Contributor

- Posts: 1608
- Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 1:09 am
- Location: Melbourne
Chinagraf wrote:WHy can't daw designers put a variable phase pot on the top of the mixer strip instead of just a polarity invert?
I mean like what year is it.. would be handier than all the ssl mix buss compressor emolations they keep making.
Yep, that would be awesome.
-

Mark Bassett - Forum Admin

- Posts: 540
- Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 6:15 pm
18 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Return to The Turtlerock Forum
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests

