MS for Mastering

An audio community like no other.

Moderators: rick, Mark Bassett

MS for Mastering

Postby Lee » Tue Sep 06, 2011 10:17 pm

After seeing David Briggs's MS presentation I became curious about what the preferred choice of equipment for decoding is (hardware of software)? Assuming there was a need to use this method.
Lee McDonald
"A smart man learns from his mistakes but a wise man learns from other's"
Lee
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 438
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 11:10 pm
Location: Northern Beaches, Sydney

Re: MS for Mastering

Postby stosostu » Wed Sep 07, 2011 1:56 am

I've always used hardware for this, either on the console, M+S, M-S, or using an external summing box.
Bob Charman - Stockport Sound, SA
The Road Goes On Forever and the Party Never Ends..........
User avatar
stosostu
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 458
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 3:17 pm
Location: Clare and Gilbert Valleys, South Australia

Re: MS for Mastering

Postby Ben M » Wed Sep 07, 2011 11:10 am

I didn't see David Briggs talking MS unfortunately. Wish I had.
However, ms is something I use only when needed.... bringing a track's image in or ... pushing it out to be more in line with the other track's spread. A lot of mixes can be wide enough these days and sometimes I find too much width can bring out those hard panned reverbs/efx and miss the meat of the track. Something to watch maybe.
Do you use anything atm Lee?

Just some observations...
Hardware: I noticed Rob had a MS box at integrate. Would probably be a really good box to have... no doubt.

Software: For rough masters the Tracks 3 Deluxe package have MS on nearly all of their processors. I quite like that package for giving rough mixes to clients. I'm sure there's many more soft options...

For MS during mixing I just copy the figure 8/ omni track and then process all three ms tracks with the same plug (something simple like a 1 band eq with a phase button on it) and put the copied track out of phase. Or multi it on the patchbay.

cheers
Ben
User avatar
Ben M
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
 
Posts: 1920
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 11:54 am
Location: Sydney and Kangaroo Valley, NSW

Re: MS for Mastering

Postby Sammas » Wed Sep 07, 2011 2:08 pm

I just encode & decode digitally, generally. I don't really see much advantage of doing it in analogue, in terms of sound quality at least.

One thing to be wary of, any processing applied independently to either the mid or side signal ultimately effects the sonics of its counterpart when it comes to decoding it back to a stereo signal.
Sammas
 

Re: MS for Mastering

Postby rob » Wed Sep 07, 2011 3:08 pm

indeed I have a custom made MS encoder / decoder with variable width control. If anyone wants to do MS in hardware it could be yours for a good price.
User avatar
rob
TRM Endorsed
TRM Endorsed
 
Posts: 1011
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 9:16 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: MS for Mastering

Postby DrAlienSmith » Thu Sep 08, 2011 9:09 am

not sure how other software handles it but Samplitude can encode and decode just by selecting an option straight from its mixer. Very easy.
Last edited by DrAlienSmith on Thu Sep 08, 2011 9:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
Al Smith
Perth, WA
http://www.bergerkstudios.com
http://draliensmith.bandcamp.com
DrAlienSmith
Registered User
Registered User
 
Posts: 149
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2005 10:39 am

Re: MS for Mastering

Postby Ben M » Thu Sep 08, 2011 9:18 am

rob wrote:indeed I have a custom made MS encoder / decoder with variable width control. If anyone wants to do MS in hardware it could be yours for a good price.


There you go Lee. Grab a cool ms box for a good price.
User avatar
Ben M
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
 
Posts: 1920
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 11:54 am
Location: Sydney and Kangaroo Valley, NSW


Return to The Turtlerock Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests