Distressor Butt Saver

An audio community like no other.

Moderators: rick, Mark Bassett

Distressor Butt Saver

Postby Aearth » Sat Dec 30, 2006 9:47 pm

Distressors saves my ars once more this time the drum buss. I normally don't insert a pair of Distressors on a mix buss, but I had no choice because I sold my Drawmer 1968 and a plugin as usual couldn't cut it.
Anyone suggest a decent compressor plugin that works on drums or on anything, the outboard route is proving to be very expensive but appears to be necessary.

Nic
Aearth
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
 
Posts: 1156
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 9:06 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby jkhuri44 » Sat Dec 30, 2006 10:01 pm

the Waves ssl 4000 series....sounds...amazing....very hardware like....and designed to be used as a buss, like a real SSL mix/master busss...
or...more common options...

if your sample rates are high enough....Waves R Comp for a vintage compression sound (as THEYYYY say)

or the waves C 1...if your looking for something more transparent.

i cant recommend the waves range enough....
jkhuri44
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 2537
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 10:53 pm
Location: Dundas

Postby Chris H » Sat Dec 30, 2006 10:45 pm

I find the sonalksis comp is quite usable
User avatar
Chris H
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 2321
Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 11:20 am
Location: Off The Planet

Postby heathen » Mon Jan 01, 2007 1:21 pm

Psp mastercomp does a pretty awesome job too, but its a mega cpu hog, especially in FAT mode. Waves SSL is usable, but can get a tad harsh at a heavy gr. I think I can see a Smart C1 or C2 in your future Nic. Also I've been getting some gooood results using the Waves SSL bundle, especially the SSL channel eq out into the c2 or ES8, but I reckon a cheaper analog comp would do a great job with the Waves ssl channel as the ssl adds a good amount of punch on its own for some reason, it's great on the bottom end thump and midrange crack.
Or maybe try to borrow an SSL Duende, I hav'nt tried it yet but some people say it smokes the waves SSL bundle.
Maybe even give Scotty a call and see if you can borrow an essence comp or 2, I just got one and it sounds superb, I think around $2800 for a pair, he may even do em cheaper for a pair. For bass they are awesome , I've tried it on vox and drums too with great results.It's almost the same as the Buzz soc though with class A amplifiers and Lundahl input and output transformers, very nice.

Your welcome to drop on over if you like and have a play with some plugs and comps.

Cheers
Heath
User avatar
heathen
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
 
Posts: 1745
Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 11:15 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby Aearth » Mon Jan 01, 2007 2:35 pm

Thanks everyone.
I looked at the Waves SSL and for the price I can buy a stereo outboard comp and my mac is only a dual 867 and recommended min from Waves is a dual 1.2
Hmmmm may need to ring Scott.


Nick
Aearth
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
 
Posts: 1156
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 9:06 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby Kris » Mon Jan 01, 2007 5:45 pm

hey nick, you can try my TC Powercore firewire if you like. Give me a call.

kris.
Kris
 

Postby davemc » Mon Jan 01, 2007 7:35 pm

Plugins well URS and Waves SSL are ok. Same the Chandler EMI stuff.
None to me gives the nice distortsion of real outboard, when I compared the URS 2254 to my 2254 similar sound just no where near it in terms of 3Dness and magic.
You could go and make DIY SSL comp if $'s are tight, I thought the one I have here sounds better then plugs I tried.
One of the things I thought the 1969/1968 did well was a parallel drum sub.. On the stereo buss never really liked it.
davemc
Registered User
Registered User
 
Posts: 210
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 11:50 pm
Location: Viewbank, Vic

Postby Peter Knight » Mon Jan 01, 2007 11:56 pm

Hey Dave have you tried the URS Cambridge EQ? I'v heard its pretty good, wondering if I should finally bite the URS bullet.
Peter Knight
Registered User
Registered User
 
Posts: 119
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 1:02 pm
Location: Perth

Postby davemc » Tue Jan 02, 2007 12:53 am

Peter Knight wrote:Hey Dave have you tried the URS Cambridge EQ? I'v heard its pretty good, wondering if I should finally bite the URS bullet.

Cambridge is UAD? isn't it.. I have a few mates you have UAD cards and love them.. Me I am happy with the Sony plugin pack myself.. Not the color, although I just do not think plugins do color well myself.
URS seem ok. I A/B there Neve with the Shep I had and again sounded ok just no magic.. I mean they are very usable plugins, I just think they should market them as good eq's and compressors instead of having a GUI and say Neve/API/SSL because they are not the same.
davemc
Registered User
Registered User
 
Posts: 210
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 11:50 pm
Location: Viewbank, Vic

Postby heathen » Tue Jan 02, 2007 11:22 am

Yeah I agree, the gui's are very misleading. Most emulations are not even close, hows the price of the waves mercury (neve emulations) bundle,I think $11,000 US, you can get the hardware at that price, rediculous!
User avatar
heathen
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
 
Posts: 1745
Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 11:15 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby Aearth » Tue Jan 02, 2007 11:48 am

I really can't believe how Waves can justify the price of their software and then hit you for their annual WUP fee.

Nic
Aearth
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
 
Posts: 1156
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 9:06 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby davemc » Tue Jan 02, 2007 11:58 am

I will not buy the waves SSL stuff. More interested in the firewire duane? SSL have. Does not cost much of a difference $ wise, uses no computer power and no WUP...I know a few people who like there liquid mix as well..Plugins are getting better although still prefer hardware if I can. Although now I am just doing some mixing at home ITB so selling the last outboard I have

I think waves is so much as probably only 1% of studios who have waves actually own it. :D
davemc
Registered User
Registered User
 
Posts: 210
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 11:50 pm
Location: Viewbank, Vic

Postby SNJ Studio » Tue Jan 02, 2007 1:49 pm

Well, if your are used to a Drawmer or a pair of Distressors on your drum bus, then plugins are not going to sound as good. There will be some that are usuable, even inspiring, but IMHO having those beautiful outboard units patched into insert points of an analogue channel is never going to sound like a mix that is in the box, being summed digitally, and has a plug in doing dynamics. The hardware will hold it's value for years, might even increase if you buy the right unit. There is more respect earned with rack units sitting on the desk than GUI's on a screen. Sure you cannot create multiple instances without bouncing tracks, but would you prefer 10 tracks of Alesis 3630 or two channels of LA2A? Because most digital compression sounds like a 3630 on a bad day, unless you spend big moolah.

Here are some digital exceptions to the rule. URS plugs can sound very cool - personally, I get more joy from the 1970 compressor than the 1980. The waves compression is crap - the renaisance (sic) plugs are very crunchy and lo-fi, and anything over 9dB of compression sounds very bad. The waves SSL compression does not impress me, even on stereo busses which is what is was made for. Sounds thin, sucks too much transient out of my sounds, not slow enough attack. If waves had of released this plug without any SSL letters associated, it would be burned at the stake in forums, but no.... it's an SSL man! Well sounds like warm shit to me. The UAD-1 compression is where it is at, my friend. I think this is as close to analogue compression I have ever heard in digital land. The fairchild is what you need on your drum bus, maybe some LA2A.... my hat really goes off to Universal Audio and I haven't even heard the new Neve emulations which are getting glowing reviews from guys who always bag out digital compressors.

My summary would be just save up for the hardware. If you really have to stay digital, sample some love from UAD-1.
Adam B
SNJ Studio
Registered User
Registered User
 
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 5:35 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby Peter Knight » Tue Jan 02, 2007 6:22 pm

davemc wrote:
Peter Knight wrote:Hey Dave have you tried the URS Cambridge EQ? I'v heard its pretty good, wondering if I should finally bite the URS bullet.

Cambridge is UAD?


You're dead right mate. Temporary brain explosion over here :lol:
Peter Knight
Registered User
Registered User
 
Posts: 119
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 1:02 pm
Location: Perth

Postby heathen » Wed Jan 03, 2007 4:27 pm

I dunno Adam the Waves ssl channel is pretty good for mixing drums if you patch out into a nice analog comp, though on thier own they are not superb, I find the bottom end in the channel strip eq pretty chunky for a plugin I also really like its gate, though the channel comp sux pretty bad. The emulation of the stereo buss comp is pretty poor too, Smart C2 is wayyyyy better . Though yeah gimmee some real ssl channels anyday. Mmmmmm a rack of 8 xlogic eq's would be great, though tooo much for me.
User avatar
heathen
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
 
Posts: 1745
Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 11:15 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby electricsound » Fri Jan 05, 2007 1:21 pm

Second the UAD love. I totally adore the UAD Fairchild on the drum bus.. can't get enough
electricsound
 

Postby kingtone » Tue Jan 30, 2007 10:01 am

I reckon you should buy a Drawmer 1968ME.... i could sell you one for good price!! :wink:
kingtone
Registered User
Registered User
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 12:02 pm
Location: Sydney / Nashville

Postby Chinagraf » Thu Feb 08, 2007 11:57 am

Have you seen the Rolls super stereo compressor? Worth a look if your into the SSL thing, it's a bit cleaner though. I have heard good things about the Hand Crafted Labs Levllar also.
User avatar
Chinagraf
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor
 
Posts: 1608
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 1:09 am
Location: Melbourne


Return to The Turtlerock Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests