i swear by a program called CDex
anyone know it
what do you use?
what are the pros and cons of different programs?
- It is currently Thu Apr 23, 2026 7:15 pm • All times are UTC + 10 hours [ DST ]
best cd ripping program
Moderators: rick, Mark Bassett
15 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Im not sure why you'd need to rip CD's these days, I just pop em in and drag em onto the desktop. Or chuck em into iTunes...
- Jason Dirckze
- Registered User

- Posts: 203
- Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 10:23 pm
- Location: Northern Beaches, Sydney
Jason Dirckze wrote:Im not sure why you'd need to rip CD's these days, I just pop em in and drag em onto the desktop. Or chuck em into iTunes...
The diff between Mac and PC i presume.
I don't think PC's especially the old os does the drag and drop things that makes the mac a convenience most of the time...
Still i'm ignorent of most things PC ( and mac!!!! )
-

Chris H - Forum Veteran

- Posts: 2321
- Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 11:20 am
- Location: Off The Planet
The reason you use EAC or cdparanoia etc. is so that you get an *accurate* *bit-for-bit* rip.
Normally a cd-drive will just stream off the disc and only use error correction if it needs it, on later drives you can detect how much error correction is being used and keep retrying to get as close as possible to what was origionally put down.
Normally a cd-drive will just stream off the disc and only use error correction if it needs it, on later drives you can detect how much error correction is being used and keep retrying to get as close as possible to what was origionally put down.
- JulienG
- Regular Contributor

- Posts: 263
- Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 3:02 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia
Pretty much, it just comes down to what features you want and which interface you like best.
Having said that, some are more equal than others, look for accuracy over speed.
Personally I have used Audiograbber (it's free) for ages and I also use dbpoweramp which does all sorts of format conversions as well as cd ripping. (Handy for making mp3's or lossless compression of session files for archiving etc)
Having said that, some are more equal than others, look for accuracy over speed.
Personally I have used Audiograbber (it's free) for ages and I also use dbpoweramp which does all sorts of format conversions as well as cd ripping. (Handy for making mp3's or lossless compression of session files for archiving etc)
peat wrote:so pretty much any ripping program would be ok?
as long as youve got a recently built cd drive?
-

Kurt - Valued Contributor

- Posts: 1235
- Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 1:02 am
- Location: Canberra
peat wrote:so pretty much any ripping program would be ok?
as long as youve got a recently built cd drive?
Not quite, the point with EAC et al is that they listen to the error count from the drive and reread several times if it's above 0 to get the accurate rip. If you just use a simple ripper (eg iTunes) they don't listen and don't care when they get dodgy (or even just plain bad) data.
- JulienG
- Regular Contributor

- Posts: 263
- Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 3:02 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia
Compresion formats like mp3, wma, ac3 etc make files smaller by removing the bits that probably won't be missed much by the listener.
If you convert an mp3 back to a wav file it will sound pretty much like the original.
Formats like flac, ape, shn are lossless formats, they work more like a zip file for wav's, when decompressed the file is identical to the original from which it was created.
The trade off is of course file size, mp3 etc can create a file much smaller than the source wav file, eg the "standard" for internet bound mp3's is 128kbps, this will result in a file approximately 1/10th of the original. Lossless compression formats are lucky to achieve file sizes lower than 3/4 of the original.
If you convert an mp3 back to a wav file it will sound pretty much like the original.
Formats like flac, ape, shn are lossless formats, they work more like a zip file for wav's, when decompressed the file is identical to the original from which it was created.
The trade off is of course file size, mp3 etc can create a file much smaller than the source wav file, eg the "standard" for internet bound mp3's is 128kbps, this will result in a file approximately 1/10th of the original. Lossless compression formats are lucky to achieve file sizes lower than 3/4 of the original.
peat wrote:thanks alot julien
ill definitely give EAC a go
kurt
what do you mean by lossless compression?
-

Kurt - Valued Contributor

- Posts: 1235
- Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 1:02 am
- Location: Canberra
They're playable if you install the direct show filters in windows, not sure if there are equivalents for macs.
peat wrote:thats what i thought you meant kurt
i just wasnt sure
perceptual encoding right
ill look into those formats that you said are lossless
are they playable
or do you have to turn them back into wavs to play them
-

Kurt - Valued Contributor

- Posts: 1235
- Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 1:02 am
- Location: Canberra
- smash
- Regular Contributor

- Posts: 443
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 12:49 am
- Location: Northern Beaches, Sydney
15 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Return to The Turtlerock Forum
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests
